foot-fetishism

I’m just wondering if there’s anyone in this situation where no one can believe photos anymore but not because of the edited content that misleads punters but of something else which no one can be blamed for just the photograph itself and the careless photographer. So, because of my foot-fetishism, I always have to carefully check out escorts’ feet before picking one but most of the times feet are neglected to represent, always just boobs and ass. Some escorts even don’t take the trouble to indicate her foot-size! Being obsessed with small feet how can I make sure what to get if I don’t have this information? Ok, say, let’s rely on the photos! But I can’t stress enough that photos are deceptive and not just because of editing, but also, the nature of camera lenses. Some types cause deformity, called barrel lens distortion. It means toward the corners of the pic forms can be a bit elongated. Most of the times it’s usually the feet that take place there, and as a result they look bigger. As a foot-fetishist, there’s nothing that can turn me off more instantly than a big escort foot…ok, other deformities can also turn me off such as overlapping or knobby toes, bunion is my nightmare. So camera lenses usually show feet bigger which I’m quite unhappy about as I don’t know the real size of the feet, making me uncertain to choose. I think escorts should take this issue more seriously and show their feet with decent photos. Long time ago it wasn’t a problem for me when hookers could stroll the streets in Sweden since I just told them to show the feet before doing anything else. But now everything is on the internet and feet are the body parts that seem the least on a photo, though they are quite important for some punters, who’d like to see more details, such as toes, sole, heels, arch, etc. So it’d be a good idea to show escort feet in detailed photos as it’s so time-consuming to get to know for the punter himself!